Talk:The Crucified Soldier

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Canadian / European / German / North America / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War I task force

Belgium farmers at fault?

I watched an older video that suggested an investigation after WWI found a former Canadian soldier in China (of all places!) who claimed to actually have seen the event happen. This soldier said that it wasn't done by German soldiers but by Belgium farmers who were disgusted with the war, and that they tied the soldier to the barn with piano wires. This soldier said he reported the farmers to the authorities and that was the last he heard of the situation.

I don't think this video was a credible source, but I thought this was interesting enough to add here, in case anyone should come up with better sources to support this.--Ducio1234 (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russian-Chechen conflict

I have deleted this recent addition, as it is inappropriate to cover it here. This page is about a specific and very well-known alleged incident in WW1, not a dumping ground for other alleged crucifixions in a military context. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Your Liberty Bond will help stop this Crisco restoration and colours.jpg to appear as POTD

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Your Liberty Bond will help stop this Crisco restoration and colours.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 11, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-11-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

The Crucified Soldier is a widespread story of an Allied soldier serving in the Canadian Corps who may have been crucified with bayonets on a barn door or tree while fighting on the Western Front during World War I. Three witnesses said they saw an unidentified crucified Canadian soldier near the battlefield of Ypres, Belgium, on or around 24 April 1915, but there was no conclusive proof such a crucifixion actually occurred. This poster, published in the Philippines in 1917, uses the story to sell liberty bonds to support the US war effort.Poster: Fernando Amorsolo; Restoration: Chris Woodrich

Archive – More featured pictures...

Clarence Darrow

The most famous American lawyer of the time visited Belgium and offered a thousand dollars for proof that the crucifixion of the Canadian soldier and other atrocities had occurred but the money, enough to buy a house, remained unclaimed.

Telling lies about Germans is a sport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.144.97.99 (talk) 22:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's your point? The article makes it clear that the story is apocryphal. clpo13_(talk) 22:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crucifixion of a corpse?

The Harry Banks story may be true. But the documentary did not suggest that Banks was crucified whilst still alive. The implication was that his body was simply displayed in an act of soldiers' black humour. A not unknown phenomenon Cassandra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.169.40 (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So may allegations of witchcraft or alien landings. What is strange is that there is no German language article on the matter. 105.8.2.100 (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there evidence or isn't there?

This article confuses me. The introduction says that there is no proof of this crime actually having occurred, but at the same time, the section "Sergeant Harry Band" says that actual evidence was, in fact, uncovered by Iain Overton in 2002. No mention is made of Overton's claims being disputed or debunked. These obviously cannot both be true simultaneously. So which am I to believe? The section which says there isn't any evidence or the section saying that there is? Regardless of which is true, the article ought to be consistent about it. And if it's not clear which is true, this should be noted. BrokenEye3 (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]